All Posts Tagged 'Risky-linkage'
- List all categories with links to all posts
- RISKY LINKAGE
Every link crawlable by Google and not on their explicit list of allowed link patterns is risky. Currently this list has just one item, that is number 68: you do me and I owe you one. The other 69 link variants known to man are on the don’ts list, hence risky. - Risky Linkage
25 posts.
- Dear webmaster, don’t trust Google on links (5 comments)
- As if sloppy social media users ain’t bad enough … search engines support traffic theft (6 comments)
- Search engines should make shortened URIs somewhat persistent (10 comments)
- How to handle a machine-readable pandemic that search engines cannot control (22 comments)
- Opting out: mailto://me is history (2 comments)
- You can’t escape from Google-Jail when … (45 comments)
- Act out your sophisticated affiliate link paranoia (11 comments)
- Text link broker woes: Google’s smart paid link sniffers (15 comments)
- A pragmatic defence against Google’s anti paid links campaign (20 comments)
- Google Toolbar PageRank deductions make sense (13 comments)
- How to fuck up click tracking with the JavaScript onclick trigger (35 comments)
- Google says you must manage your affiliate links in order to get indexed (23 comments)
- Google manifested the axe on reciprocal link exchanges (2 comments)
- Google to kill the power of links
- Google enhances the quality guidelines (4 comments)
- Google hunts paid links and reciprocal linkage (1 comment)
- Where is the precise definition of a paid link? (10 comments)
- Revise your linkage now
- Link monkey business is not worth a whoop
- Hapless Structures and Weak Linkage
- Interested in buying a text link
- Is buying and selling text links risky?
- Reciprocal links are not penalized by Google (1 comment)
- Serious Disadvantages of Selling Links
- Systematic Link Patterns Kill SE-Traffic
|
Share/bookmark this: del.icio.us • Google • ma.gnolia • Mixx • Netscape • reddit • Sphinn • Squidoo • StumbleUpon • Yahoo MyWeb Subscribe to |