Comments on: How to disagree on Twitter, machine-readable http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/ If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:15:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Moris http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2775 Moris Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:31:19 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2775 Its a good term you used "Condomizer". You are doing good. Good luck to you. Its a good term you used “Condomizer”. You are doing good. Good luck to you.

]]> By: Max http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2246 Max Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:06:43 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2246 Comdomizer tool really rocks! I will try to condomize all my URI )))) [It seems you didn't understand it.] Comdomizer tool really rocks! I will try to condomize all my URI ))))

[It seems you didn’t understand it.]

]]> By: Inside the Webb http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2138 Inside the Webb Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:57:39 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2138 This is a great article man! I just found your site through Sphinn and I really like your posts, keep up the great content I'll be following This is a great article man! I just found your site through Sphinn and I really like your posts, keep up the great content I’ll be following

]]> By: Jane http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2135 Jane Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:14:32 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2135 I agree with Sebastian, I don't really trust search engines. I agree with Sebastian, I don’t really trust search engines.

]]> By: Sebastian http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2133 Sebastian Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:49:05 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2133 Heh. $isCrawler is totally innocent WRT cloaking. Like in "if ($isCrawler) {logThisRequest();}". ;-) Not trusting search engines is a good habit. I know redirect chains involving disallow'ed scripts work with Google, but I wouldn't bet some of the minor players possibly get its semantics. Also, it's way too complex, and slower because it adds a totally useless redirect to the chain. Serving users the requested location whilst blocking crawlers is clean, elegant, and 100% safe. Heh. $isCrawler is totally innocent WRT cloaking. Like in “if ($isCrawler) {logThisRequest();}”. ;-)
Not trusting search engines is a good habit. I know redirect chains involving disallow’ed scripts work with Google, but I wouldn’t bet some of the minor players possibly get its semantics. Also, it’s way too complex, and slower because it adds a totally useless redirect to the chain. Serving users the requested location whilst blocking crawlers is clean, elegant, and 100% safe.

]]> By: Everfluxx http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2132 Everfluxx Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:08:12 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/the-uri-link-condom-for-social-media/#comment-2132 $isCrawler? I smell cloaking. :D Why not redirect through a robots.txt'ed out location instead? $isCrawler? I smell cloaking. :D Why not redirect through a robots.txt’ed out location instead?

]]>