http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/ If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:01:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1517 Search Tech - All 2009 Nominees » SEMMYS.org Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:24:40 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1517 [...] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps Sebastian X | 1/3/08 [...] […] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps Sebastian X | 1/3/08 […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1198 @ALL: Give Google your feedback on NOINDEX, but read this pamphlet beforehand! Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:09:06 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1198 [...] probably URIs tagged with NOINDEX in robots.txt cannot accumulate PageRank. In my humble opinion the DISALLOW behavior of NOINDEX in robots.txt is completely wrong, and without any doubt in no way compliant to the Robots Exclusion [...] […] probably URIs tagged with NOINDEX in robots.txt cannot accumulate PageRank. In my humble opinion the DISALLOW behavior of NOINDEX in robots.txt is completely wrong, and without any doubt in no way compliant to the Robots Exclusion […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1120 This Month In SEO - 1/08 | TheVanBlog Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:12:04 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1120 [...] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps [...] […] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1108 This Month In SEO - 1/08 - TheVanBlog Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:57:04 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1108 [...] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps [...] […] My plea to Google - Please sanitize your REP revamps […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1039 Playing with the X-Robots-Tag HTTP header - SEO - Joost de Valk's SEO Blog Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:23:32 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1039 [...] Sebastian pointed out and explains thoroughly in another brilliant post, pages that search engines aren't allowed to spider, can still show up in the search results, when [...] […] Sebastian pointed out and explains thoroughly in another brilliant post, pages that search engines aren’t allowed to spider, can still show up in the search results, when […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1023 Sebastian Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:43:25 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1023 Thanks for biting, Syzlak. Check your smutbox. Thanks for biting, Syzlak. Check your smutbox.

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1019 Get a grip on the Robots Exclusion Protocol (REP) Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:26:39 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-1019 [...] pamphlet discussing a possible standardization of REP tags as robots.txt directives could be a useful reference, also please watch the great video here. Share/bookmark this: [...] […] pamphlet discussing a possible standardization of REP tags as robots.txt directives could be a useful reference, also please watch the great video here. Share/bookmark this: […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-968 Getting URLs outta Google - the good, the popular, and the definitive way Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:01:32 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-968 [...] talk in the SEOsphere lately. That’s a good thing in my opinion, because the good old robots.txt’s power is underestimated. Unfortunately it’s quite often misused or even abused too, usually because [...] […] talk in the SEOsphere lately. That’s a good thing in my opinion, because the good old robots.txt’s power is underestimated. Unfortunately it’s quite often misused or even abused too, usually because […]

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-966 Utah SEO Pro Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:52:19 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-966 Excellent post. I'd love to see all those directives in robots.txt. Excellent post. I’d love to see all those directives in robots.txt.

]]> http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-955 ‘I Robot’ with SebastianX of ‘Sebastian’s Pamphlets’ > Robots.txt Help - Hobo SEO UK Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:48:36 +0000 http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/standardization-of-rep-tags-as-robots-txt-directives/#comment-955 [...] than my brain, partly dumped here. I even developed a few new robots.txt directives and posted a request for comments a few days ago. I hope that Google, the one and only search engine that seriously invests in REP [...] […] than my brain, partly dumped here. I even developed a few new robots.txt directives and posted a request for comments a few days ago. I hope that Google, the one and only search engine that seriously invests in REP […]

]]>