<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to spam the hell out of Google&#8217;s new source attribution meta elements</title>
	<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/</link>
	<description>If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Warner Carter</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if this tag would help an original article on a website or a blog post. Would Google see it as spam if I used that meta for an original blog post I placed in article directories, guest posts or on a Squidoo Lens? It seems to me with this tag I could have a link while showing a page that has no anchor text or get a link from an otherwise nofollow placement, but might get slapped for doing so.


[Nope, wouldn't help. That's for Google News only. Sebastian]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if this tag would help an original article on a website or a blog post. Would Google see it as spam if I used that meta for an original blog post I placed in article directories, guest posts or on a Squidoo Lens? It seems to me with this tag I could have a link while showing a page that has no anchor text or get a link from an otherwise nofollow placement, but might get slapped for doing so.</p>
<p>[Nope, wouldn&#8217;t help. That&#8217;s for Google News only. Sebastian]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Book.com</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Book.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;... Recently Google created a news source attribution tag. If it works, it might be a good idea. But (even outside of spam) there are ways it can backfire. ...&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230; Recently Google created a news source attribution tag. If it works, it might be a good idea. But (even outside of spam) there are ways it can backfire. &#8230;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 11/23/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 11/23/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>[...] How to spam the hell out of Google’s new source attribution meta elements  &#8211; A highly entertaining post from everyone&#8217;s favourite crab (Sebastian). He&#8217;s really becoming the king of the tongue in cheek posts lately. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] How to spam the hell out of Google’s new source attribution meta elements  &#8211; A highly entertaining post from everyone&#8217;s favourite crab (Sebastian). He&#8217;s really becoming the king of the tongue in cheek posts lately. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>I don't know whether the GoogleNews indexer will process misplaced meta elements or not. I wouldn't recommend it, though. I assume that the News thingy can create a graph with page level metadata with ease.  

You can always use the CITE attribute in Q (...) elements to credit a particular quote, although as of today SE support of CITE is, well, not really existent. That'll change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether the GoogleNews indexer will process misplaced meta elements or not. I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it, though. I assume that the News thingy can create a graph with page level metadata with ease.  </p>
<p>You can always use the CITE attribute in Q (&#8230;) elements to credit a particular quote, although as of today SE support of CITE is, well, not really existent. That&#8217;ll change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Freak Show</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Freak Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling we will see a ton of abuse on the new meta - followed by a whole bunch of crying newbies that don't understand the levels of risk.  Especially since the newest craze is 'so called gurus' promoting the hell outta get-it-while-its-hot rank on page 1 in under 3 minutes Google News products.  The good news is that $497 is a little steep for most, but thats what torrents are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling we will see a ton of abuse on the new meta - followed by a whole bunch of crying newbies that don&#8217;t understand the levels of risk.  Especially since the newest craze is &#8217;so called gurus&#8217; promoting the hell outta get-it-while-its-hot rank on page 1 in under 3 minutes Google News products.  The good news is that $497 is a little steep for most, but thats what torrents are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>It would have made much more sense if they had added a way to just use a data attribute with cite or blockquote.

That also then allows analysis at a block level.

Can you get away with using these meta elements within the body? I know that might not validate, but it can work with redirects and have a purpose (such as firing a pixel)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have made much more sense if they had added a way to just use a data attribute with cite or blockquote.</p>
<p>That also then allows analysis at a block level.</p>
<p>Can you get away with using these meta elements within the body? I know that might not validate, but it can work with redirects and have a purpose (such as firing a pixel)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, November 17, 2010</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, November 17, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>[...] How to spam the hell out of Google&#8217;s new source attribution meta elements, sebastians-pamphlets.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] How to spam the hell out of Google&rsquo;s new source attribution meta elements, sebastians-pamphlets.com [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SERPD</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>SERPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/spam-google-news-source-attribution-tags/#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How to spam the hell out of Google's new source attribution meta elements...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sebastian had his (as always) side door approach and thoughts on the new Google (News) meta tags. Fun ride as always....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to spam the hell out of Google&#8217;s new source attribution meta elements&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sebastian had his (as always) side door approach and thoughts on the new Google (News) meta tags. Fun ride as always&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
