<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN spam to continue says the Live Search Blog</title>
	<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/</link>
	<description>If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: How to cleverly integrate your own URI shortener</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>How to cleverly integrate your own URI shortener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>[...] SE candidate is Bing&#8217;s spam bot that tries to manipulate stats on search engine usage. If you don&#8217;t approve such scams, block [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SE candidate is Bing&#8217;s spam bot that tries to manipulate stats on search engine usage. If you don&#8217;t approve such scams, block [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The hacker tool MSN-LiveSearch is responsible for brute force attacks</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>The hacker tool MSN-LiveSearch is responsible for brute force attacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>[...] MSN LiveSearch is well known for spamming, it&#8217;s not a big surprise that they support hackers, scrapers and other content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MSN LiveSearch is well known for spamming, it&#8217;s not a big surprise that they support hackers, scrapers and other content [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Today I found more fake referrers from MSN with a new "referrer URL" &lt;a href="http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=index&#038;scope=&#038;first=0&#038;FORM=PERE" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=index&#038;scope=&#038;first=0&#038;FORM=PERE&lt;/a&gt;. There's no reason my site could rank for [index], and I highly doubt that on a Sunday 32 MSN users search for "index" and land on a script URL that captures invalid URIs and redirects such requests to the best matching pages. Not that I did believe the lies that MSN will reduce the spam and that it will be better targeted ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I found more fake referrers from MSN with a new &#8220;referrer URL&#8221; <a href="http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=index&#038;scope=&#038;first=0&#038;FORM=PERE" rel="nofollow">http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=index&#038;scope=&#038;first=0&#038;FORM=PERE</a>. There&#8217;s no reason my site could rank for [index], and I highly doubt that on a Sunday 32 MSN users search for &#8220;index&#8221; and land on a script URL that captures invalid URIs and redirects such requests to the best matching pages. Not that I did believe the lies that MSN will reduce the spam and that it will be better targeted &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner Christensen</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-795</guid>
		<description>MSN has always had some wacky way of going about things. It's no wonder MSN is ranking behind Google and Yahoo for search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSN has always had some wacky way of going about things. It&#8217;s no wonder MSN is ranking behind Google and Yahoo for search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david deangelo</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>david deangelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-793</guid>
		<description>I actually don't understand what MSN is trying to achieve out of all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t understand what MSN is trying to achieve out of all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanol</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I read your post and couldn't help myself.

I had to create a cheap Shepard Fairey "obey" knock off.

http://www.constantlycomplaining.com/blog/files/imagepicker/r/ryanol/obeymsn.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your post and couldn&#8217;t help myself.</p>
<p>I had to create a cheap Shepard Fairey &#8220;obey&#8221; knock off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.constantlycomplaining.com/blog/files/imagepicker/r/ryanol/obeymsn.gif">http://www.constantlycomplaining.com/blog/files/imagepicker/r/ryanol/obeymsn.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Search Coverage &#38; Link Finds: December 5, 2007</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Search Coverage &#38; Link Finds: December 5, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-791</guid>
		<description>[...] MSN spam to continue says the Live Search Blog, sebastians-pamphlets.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MSN spam to continue says the Live Search Blog, sebastians-pamphlets.com [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-790</guid>
		<description>Look at IncrediBill's piece &lt;a href="http://incredibill.blogspot.com/2007/11/livecoms-search-spam-hysteria-and-area.html"&gt;The referrer spam from MSN is just a huge red herring&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.webshoppehosting.com/weblog/?p=17"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; from an ex-MS employee confirming that MSN does quality control with various user agents and tools from this IP range. At least log all requests from 131.107.0.* because most of them are bogus. If you don't cloak for MSN, just block the IP range, the artificial traffic isn't worth a dime. If they really delist you at Live Search because you've blocked their spambots, who cares, they don't send enough human traffic to compensate the bot load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at IncrediBill&#8217;s piece <a href="http://incredibill.blogspot.com/2007/11/livecoms-search-spam-hysteria-and-area.html">The referrer spam from MSN is just a huge red herring</a>, and <a href="http://www.webshoppehosting.com/weblog/?p=17">this post</a> from an ex-MS employee confirming that MSN does quality control with various user agents and tools from this IP range. At least log all requests from 131.107.0.* because most of them are bogus. If you don&#8217;t cloak for MSN, just block the IP range, the artificial traffic isn&#8217;t worth a dime. If they really delist you at Live Search because you&#8217;ve blocked their spambots, who cares, they don&#8217;t send enough human traffic to compensate the bot load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlightlyShadySEO</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>SlightlyShadySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/msn-admits-clueless-and-ineffective-spamming/#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Ugh. So now I get to update cloakers again. I'm starting to think "screw it". I might just goatse all MSN traffic.

But I'm also starting to think this isn't so much a standard test, but more of a possible beta for a future(secondary) crawler that's going to be around for a long, long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. So now I get to update cloakers again. I&#8217;m starting to think &#8220;screw it&#8221;. I might just goatse all MSN traffic.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m also starting to think this isn&#8217;t so much a standard test, but more of a possible beta for a future(secondary) crawler that&#8217;s going to be around for a long, long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
