<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do Majestic and LinkScape get their raw data?</title>
	<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/</link>
	<description>If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>Great observation. I currently use SEOmoz because they give you API for $79/month I don't think its such a bad deal. However, I was comparing their data to Majestic at work and I realized that Majestic is able to give a lot more results, especially when it came to unique domains, they are also more up to date then SEOmoz. So, I might consider switching to Majestic, especially reading that interview at seobook, Majestic actually uses their own servers to crawl millions of web sites daily and acquire those statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observation. I currently use SEOmoz because they give you API for $79/month I don&#8217;t think its such a bad deal. However, I was comparing their data to Majestic at work and I realized that Majestic is able to give a lot more results, especially when it came to unique domains, they are also more up to date then SEOmoz. So, I might consider switching to Majestic, especially reading that interview at seobook, Majestic actually uses their own servers to crawl millions of web sites daily and acquire those statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOmoz LDA Tool &#8211; Just 3 Points</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOmoz LDA Tool &#8211; Just 3 Points</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>[...] An interesting situation for instance were claims about the source of their data for Linkscape. Sebastian covered it and did Michael (actually quite a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] An interesting situation for instance were claims about the source of their data for Linkscape. Sebastian covered it and did Michael (actually quite a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increase Traffic</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Increase Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>This post is just another GREAT example of what I always tell some beginners I mentor, NEVER take everything you learn literally. SEOmoz and ANY other "guru" should be heard, taken into consideration, analyzed, dissected, questioned and ultimately YOU as an internet marketer should implement your own strategies and come to your own conclusions. Not everything works exactly the same for everyone. And WE ALL know that there are lots of companies that will inflate their numbers in order to appear more attractive, established and important. 

Great read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is just another GREAT example of what I always tell some beginners I mentor, NEVER take everything you learn literally. SEOmoz and ANY other &#8220;guru&#8221; should be heard, taken into consideration, analyzed, dissected, questioned and ultimately YOU as an internet marketer should implement your own strategies and come to your own conclusions. Not everything works exactly the same for everyone. And WE ALL know that there are lots of companies that will inflate their numbers in order to appear more attractive, established and important. </p>
<p>Great read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get yourself a smart robots.txt</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Get yourself a smart robots.txt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>[...] and other Web robots are the plague of today&#8217;s InterWebs. Some bots like search engine crawlers behave (IOW [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and other Web robots are the plague of today&#8217;s InterWebs. Some bots like search engine crawlers behave (IOW [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Search Status is from Quirk, who are fun people to have a beer with
http://www.quirk.biz/download-searchstatus

Just because they use SEOmoz data doesn't mean it influences crawl, it could only aid URL discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Status is from Quirk, who are fun people to have a beer with<br />
<a href="http://www.quirk.biz/download-searchstatus">http://www.quirk.biz/download-searchstatus</a></p>
<p>Just because they use SEOmoz data doesn&#8217;t mean it influences crawl, it could only aid URL discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Léo,</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Léo,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>ok, possibly not the complete picture but, the SEOMoz Search Status plugin has had 685.000 downloads, and I just noticed that in their privacy policy it says that it's going to send info back to Alexa : 

Maybe it also send a duplicate to SEOMoz, or maybe they have a deal to use Alexa's data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, possibly not the complete picture but, the SEOMoz Search Status plugin has had 685.000 downloads, and I just noticed that in their privacy policy it says that it&#8217;s going to send info back to Alexa : </p>
<p>Maybe it also send a duplicate to SEOMoz, or maybe they have a deal to use Alexa&#8217;s data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weekly Insider 1-18-10 to 1-28-10</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weekly Insider 1-18-10 to 1-28-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>[...] How do Majestic and LinkScape get their raw data?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] How do Majestic and LinkScape get their raw data?  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rinkjustice</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>rinkjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>I'm glad there are the brave few like yourself who will publicly decry Emperor Rand Fishkin and his "new clothes".

Subscribed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad there are the brave few like yourself who will publicly decry Emperor Rand Fishkin and his &#8220;new clothes&#8221;.</p>
<p>Subscribed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Younus</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>Younus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>Majestic and LinkScape both definitely used some technical tool to get their raw data..

[Nominated for this decade's most intelligent comment.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majestic and LinkScape both definitely used some technical tool to get their raw data..</p>
<p>[Nominated for this decade&#8217;s most intelligent comment.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mart</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/linkscape-opensiteexplorer-majestic-data-sources-shady-or-not/#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>One question left for me. Who is actually delivering the crawl data? Is it like cuil? Or yahoo/bing/google? Or a bunch of small and sneaky stealth buggers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question left for me. Who is actually delivering the crawl data? Is it like cuil? Or yahoo/bing/google? Or a bunch of small and sneaky stealth buggers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

