<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vaporize yourself before Google burns your linking power</title>
	<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/</link>
	<description>If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: The Weekly Insider 6-15-09 to 6-19-09</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weekly Insider 6-15-09 to 6-19-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>[...] Vaporize yourself before Google burns your linking power  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vaporize yourself before Google burns your linking power  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>Errioxa, I'd say your routine fails after the recent changes at Google. Not only that Google figures out such stuff for ages, for example to detect sneaky JavaScript redirects, nowadays they pass link juice with such links and that's obviously not what you want when the original link is condomized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errioxa, I&#8217;d say your routine fails after the recent changes at Google. Not only that Google figures out such stuff for ages, for example to detect sneaky JavaScript redirects, nowadays they pass link juice with such links and that&#8217;s obviously not what you want when the original link is condomized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errioxa</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Errioxa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>Other way 

function enlacesnofollow(enlace) {
    
    trozoUrl = "'http://";   
    trozoOrden ="window.";   
    trozoOrden2 ="location.";
    trozoOrden3 = "href=";
   
    
    eva&#124;(trozoOrden trozoOrden2 trozoOrden3 trozoUrl enlace "'");
}

hola  

remove spaces</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other way </p>
<p>function enlacesnofollow(enlace) {</p>
<p>    trozoUrl = &#8220;&#8216;http://&#8221;;<br />
    trozoOrden =&#8221;window.&#8221;;<br />
    trozoOrden2 =&#8221;location.&#8221;;<br />
    trozoOrden3 = &#8220;href=&#8221;;</p>
<p>    eva|(trozoOrden trozoOrden2 trozoOrden3 trozoUrl enlace &#8220;&#8216;&#8221;);<br />
}</p>
<p>hola  </p>
<p>remove spaces</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dictina &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nofollow y Pagerank sculpting ¿se acabó la fiesta?</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dictina &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nofollow y Pagerank sculpting ¿se acabó la fiesta?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>[...] Danny Sullivan responde el 16 también. Mientras tanto, en todo el mundo gente como Errioxa o Sebastian se rebelan, hacen pruebas y comparten el [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Danny Sullivan responde el 16 también. Mientras tanto, en todo el mundo gente como Errioxa o Sebastian se rebelan, hacen pruebas y comparten el [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just curious ... anybody spotted the implicit part of the post's title?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;"Vaporize [your nofollow'ed links] yourself before Google burns your linking power"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The same goes for the URI&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;code&gt;/dear-google-please-vaporize&lt;/code&gt;[links you don't like for various reasons]&lt;code&gt;-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters&lt;/code&gt;[with policies requiring machine readable tagging of links]&lt;code&gt;/&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious &#8230; anybody spotted the implicit part of the post&#8217;s title?</p>
<p style="margin-left:30px;">&#8220;Vaporize [your nofollow&#8217;ed links] yourself before Google burns your linking power&#8221;</p>
<p>The same goes for the URI</p>
<p style="margin-left:30px;"><code>/dear-google-please-vaporize</code>[links you don&#8217;t like for various reasons]<code>-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters</code>[with policies requiring machine readable tagging of links]<code>/</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>amen brother</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen brother</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonah, I've changed the URI dropped by Micheal from a sales pitch for "Volcano Vaporizer" to a Google SERP featuring the product. I've a &lt;a href="http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/about/policies/#commenting"&gt;comment policy&lt;/a&gt; linked right above the input form that states "I don’t link to sales pitches, so please don’t feel offended when I remove a link".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree that the comment is humorous, that's why I didn't delete it. However, link drops pointing to sales pitches &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; spammy. I've just healed the comment's minor malady. ;) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way ... &lt;code&gt;rel="vaporize-nofollow"&lt;/code&gt; does not count as link condom. The REL attribute's content is defined as a space delimited list. Hence a search engine crawler  scraping "vaporize-nofollow" from my A element doesn't count this value as "nofollow". Maybe the CSS highlighting condomized links in your browser assumes the presence of a link condom, but search engines shouldn't. And yes, I'm a nitpicking old fart hiding most of the funny stuff from the rendering engine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonah, I&#8217;ve changed the URI dropped by Micheal from a sales pitch for &#8220;Volcano Vaporizer&#8221; to a Google SERP featuring the product. I&#8217;ve a <a href="http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/about/policies/#commenting">comment policy</a> linked right above the input form that states &#8220;I don’t link to sales pitches, so please don’t feel offended when I remove a link&#8221;.</p>
<p>I agree that the comment is humorous, that&#8217;s why I didn&#8217;t delete it. However, link drops pointing to sales pitches <b>are</b> spammy. I&#8217;ve just healed the comment&#8217;s minor malady. <img src='http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way &#8230; <code>rel="vaporize-nofollow"</code> does not count as link condom. The REL attribute&#8217;s content is defined as a space delimited list. Hence a search engine crawler  scraping &#8220;vaporize-nofollow&#8221; from my A element doesn&#8217;t count this value as &#8220;nofollow&#8221;. Maybe the CSS highlighting condomized links in your browser assumes the presence of a link condom, but search engines shouldn&#8217;t. And yes, I&#8217;m a nitpicking old fart hiding most of the funny stuff from the rendering engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah Stein</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Sebastian

I really appreciate the comment you left on Matt's blog about how many man hours Google policy changes require from everyone else.  

I have to differ with you about labeling Michael's comment as spammy.  His take is humorous and in line with the overall tone of your post.  You are, after all, telling people to vaporize before Google burns and I might not understand his joke without the link.

 I understand that you choose to nofollow it (since it is your site), but I wouldn't call it spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sebastian</p>
<p>I really appreciate the comment you left on Matt&#8217;s blog about how many man hours Google policy changes require from everyone else.  </p>
<p>I have to differ with you about labeling Michael&#8217;s comment as spammy.  His take is humorous and in line with the overall tone of your post.  You are, after all, telling people to vaporize before Google burns and I might not understand his joke without the link.</p>
<p> I understand that you choose to nofollow it (since it is your site), but I wouldn&#8217;t call it spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheal</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>I am so disappointed to read this post is about PageRank.  I thought you were discussing Google vaporizing &lt;b&gt;green herbs&lt;/b&gt; instead of burning them, not green fairy dust.  The &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;num=100&#038;q=Volcano+Vaporizer" rel="vaporize-nofollow"&gt;Volcano Vaporizer&lt;/a&gt; is not recommended for vaporizing PageRank ;).

[Spammy link drop properly vaporized by this blog's internal PageRank&#8482;Flow&#174;-Vaporizer&#169;.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so disappointed to read this post is about PageRank.  I thought you were discussing Google vaporizing <b>green herbs</b> instead of burning them, not green fairy dust.  The <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;num=100&#038;q=Volcano+Vaporizer" rel="vaporize-nofollow">Volcano Vaporizer</a> is not recommended for vaporizing PageRank ;).</p>
<p>[Spammy link drop properly vaporized by this blog&#8217;s internal PageRank&trade;Flow&reg;-Vaporizer&copy;.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Finally Makes Up Their Mind About PageRank Scuplting With The No Follow Tag</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Finally Makes Up Their Mind About PageRank Scuplting With The No Follow Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/dear-google-please-vaporize-yourself-and-dont-bother-us-webmasters/#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>[...] Vaporize yourself before Google burns your linking power [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vaporize yourself before Google burns your linking power [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
