<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another way to implement a site search facility</title>
	<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/</link>
	<description>If you've read my articles somewhere on the Internet, expect something different here.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Ryan</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Agreed - was just quicker to check the anonymous option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed - was just quicker to check the anonymous option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>A signed statement would be more creditable, just sign in and provide a name and if you like a link to your employers Web site. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course, I've omitted lots of EasyAsk features, for example I didn't mention the enterprise edition (controllers should love it) and the ISP edition which frees capacities at IT departments because it enables users to submit ad-hoc queries without SQL knowledge. That's a search blog ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A signed statement would be more creditable, just sign in and provide a name and if you like a link to your employers Web site. </p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;ve omitted lots of EasyAsk features, for example I didn&#8217;t mention the enterprise edition (controllers should love it) and the ISP edition which frees capacities at IT departments because it enables users to submit ad-hoc queries without SQL knowledge. That&#8217;s a search blog <img src='http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/another-way-to-implement-a-site-search-facility/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>This is a useful summary of the EasyAsk features - thanks. Of course there are a bunch of other site search technologies that people should consider if they're looking to replace the bad search that came with their shopping cart. At the Internet Retailer show last week the other site search vendors included SLI Systems (I work for these guys), Mercardo, Endeca, Fast, Celebros, and Nextopia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a useful summary of the EasyAsk features - thanks. Of course there are a bunch of other site search technologies that people should consider if they&#8217;re looking to replace the bad search that came with their shopping cart. At the Internet Retailer show last week the other site search vendors included SLI Systems (I work for these guys), Mercardo, Endeca, Fast, Celebros, and Nextopia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
